Loading...
We filed a CWJC before the Hon’ble High Court and succeeded. The Court directed the University to conduct a special examination and consider our representation. However, the University later rejected our representation by citing its internal rules. We then filed a contempt (MJC) case, but the University managed the matter in its favor. During the contempt proceedings, the University applied a rule meant for its own students (batch 2023–27), whereas I am a student of a different University governed by a separate set of rules. The University concealed this fact and wrongly applied the same rule to my case, resulting in the MJC being disposed of without proper consideration. What legal remedy is now available to have my grievance properly heard?
You may file a review or recall petition before the same High Court, explaining that incorrect rules were applied and relevant facts were concealed. If review is not allowed, you can file a fresh writ petition challenging the University’s action or approach the Supreme Court if advised. For further legal assistance, contact us on our helpline number.