Loading...
Seeking legal guidance on filing appeals before the High Court/Sessions Court against two acquittals passed on 31-08-2026 by the Additional Mahila Court, Tiruvallur, due to alleged trial-stage lawyer misconduct. Cases: Bigamy – Acquitted and Cruelty – Acquitted. Issues: During the trial, we faced serious misconduct and alleged collusion by local counsel, which resulted in compromised cross-examination of key witnesses and failure to properly present important evidence. Queries: 1. Can the victim file an appeal against the acquittal under Section 498A directly before the Sessions Court under Section 372 CrPC without involving the State Prosecutor? 2. What is the procedure for seeking Special Leave to Appeal under Section 378(4) CrPC before the Madras High Court in the bigamy private complaint case? 3. Can the trial counsel’s oversights, negligence, or alleged collusion be raised as grounds in the appellate petition? 4. What is the applicable limitation period for filing an appeal or leave petition against the acquittal dated 31-08-2026?
Both acquittals can be challenged through appropriate appellate remedies. For the 498A case, a victim may have a right of appeal under Section 372 CrPC, subject to the applicable transition provisions. For the private bigamy complaint, special leave under Section 378(4) CrPC may be sought before the Madras High Court. Lawyer negligence or collusion can be pleaded if specific prejudice is demonstrated. Limitation must be calculated carefully. For further legal assistance contact us on our helpline number.